Project execution plans (PEP) show who completes each task. As well as relevant priorities, policies & procedures. Furthermore, a client contract can involve many parties. Significantly, things must be in place regarding items not in the main contract.
Particularly, project directors normally complete PEPs. On behalf of a client, project manager. Or simultaneously, even a management contractor or construction manager.
Project Execution Plans. The requirements:
A business case & strategic brief would be developed. Unquestionably, information for the PEP is normally based on this information. Subsequently, it can contain a lot of information. e.g.:
Reports are presented better in a database or spreadsheet. As they can easily be added to.
Markedly, PEP can be reviewed. Progress can be calculated & changes made.
The client & team normally produce management plans. Unquestionably, a better term might be a project implementation plan.
Unquestionably, a PEP outlines how an architectural project can be managed. Moreover, it outlines which individual will complete tasks. Along with priorities, policies & procedures. Specifically, they can involve multiple people. Some of whom may be outside the company. However, a range of people can complete a project execution plan. e.g.:
A PEP can be a complex document. Containing a wide range of information. Although mainly presented as a report. Significantly, a spreadsheet or database is undeniably better.
Unquestionably, PEP review outlines project progress.
In most cases, architects create a specific management plan. Henceforth, 3rd party suppliers normally produce execution plans. Undeniably, the term project implementation plan is more suited than PEP.
Are you beginning an architectural project. Do you need to produce a PEP?❮ Back to Blog